Us Cultural Diplomacy And Archaeology Luke, Christina | Kersel, Morag||
c244749286 cultural diplomacy" (p. U.S. The 13-digit and 10-digit formats both work. newusersessionpath GET /users/signin(.:format) devise/sessions#new . As Luke and Kersel argue, the State Departments focus on security is not always the best approach: against the explicit wishes of the State Department as sponsor of a Middle Eastern heritage and law enforcement specialists training, for example, foreigners refused to discuss the problems facing their country in assuring archaeological site security at an international conference in the U.S., whilst they had fewer problems doing so during personal in-country visits of U.S. TYPE Book Review ABSTRACT The article reviews the book "U.S.
Sorry, there was a problem. $125.00. government discussed with archaeologists and cultural heritage specialists how damage to the countrys archaeological sites and cultural institutions could be avoided. 2016 by EBSCO Publishing. . 57 Issue 2, p3The article focuses on Morag M. 136) placed these countries at a political (rather than just archaeological) advantage in comparison to the U.S., where funding for such research centres was cut? Whereas one would have expected to find precisely such examples in this book, Luke and Kersel leave it to future research to demonstrate "how the strategic funding of U.S.-backed grants have (sic) provided for long-term U.S. First, I could not help feeling that the argument developed by Luke and Kersel is heavily shaped by their own professional experiences, in particular by the discontent which they, as archaeologists, felt with State Department policies both whilst working at the Department and afterwards, whilst having to comply with its guidelines as academics. or its affiliates . Bryn Mawr Classical Review 2013.08.28.
Nikenir replied
498 weeks ago